An apology for socratic bioethics

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):3 – 7 (2008)
Bioethics is a hybrid discipline. As a theoretical enterprise it stands for untrammeled inquiry and argument. Yet it aims to influence medical practice and policy. In this article we explore tensions between these two dimensions of bioethics and examine the merits and perils of a “Socratic” approach to bioethics that challenges “the conventional wisdom.”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802248153
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,433
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Winston Chiong (2006). The Real Problem with Equipoise. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Paul Root Wolpe (2008). Disciplining Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):1 – 2.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #281,446 of 1,925,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,130 of 1,925,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.