Hume’s Citation of Strabo and the Dating of the Memoranda

Hume Studies 39 (2):197-202 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this discussion note, I put forth evidence to argue against the recent assertions made in favor of the late 1740s or early 1750s date for the composition of Hume’s memoranda. In particular, I show that the claims made regarding Hume’s reference to Strabo in the memoranda do not provide evidence for such a late date of composition but, rather, provide evidence for the date of composition being considerably earlier.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's Early Memoranda, 1729-1740: The Complete Text.Ernest Campbell Mossner - 1948 - Journal of the History of Ideas 9 (4):492.
Hume's "Malezieu Argument".Todd Ryan - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (1):105-118.
Hume's "Malezieu Argument".Todd Ryan - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (1):105-118.
On the Composition of the Prototractatus.Jinho Kang - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):1–20.
Owen on Humean Reason.Don Garrett - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (2):291-303.
Hume, the New Hume, and Causal Connections.Ken Levy - 2000 - Hume Studies 26 (1):41-75.
Contrary miracles concluded.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1985 - Hume Studies 1985 (Supplement):1 - 14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-18

Downloads
43 (#380,907)

6 months
13 (#219,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references