Life-Sustaining Treatment under Dispute

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (4):667-682 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Texas Advance Directives Act stipulates the process by which physicians may withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment contrary to the wishes of the patient or medical proxy. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of families and clinicians have faced this personal and distressing dispute. Catholic teaching offers a rich tradition for assessing the ethics of life-sustaining treatment and analyzing disputes over its administration, yielding the conclusion that a Catholic defense of the Texas Advance Directives Act is untenable. Two objections rooted in patient harm and physician conscience fail. A solution that fairly respects the patient’s moral right to choose life-sustaining treatment is offered.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain-Dead and Pregnant in Texas.Thomas Wm Mayo - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (8):15-18.
Prospective Medical-Moral Decision Making.Peter J. Cataldo & Elliott Louis Bedford - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):53-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-07

Downloads
16 (#906,830)

6 months
10 (#382,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references