Escepticismo ante las reglas y pedigree democrático de la dificultad contramayoritaria

DOXA 1 (44):219-232 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The counter majoritarian difficulty is one of the main objections against the judicial review. In this paper, this objection is analyzed from the standpoint of the norm formulation/norm distinction. By stressing the distinc- tion between norm formulations and norms, I claim that when judicial review prevents the application of a norm to an individual case the counter majoritarian difficulty objection does not hold.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assertion: knowledge is enough.Mona Simion - 2016 - Synthese 193 (10).
Knowledge and Attributability.Cameron Boult - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):329-350.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
230 (#90,036)

6 months
110 (#47,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sebastián Reyes Molina
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why Law Matters.Alon Harel - 2014 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Add more references