Really taking metaphysics seriously

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):632-633 (2004)

Authors
Barbara Gail Montero
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
Ross & Spurrett (R&S) fail to take metaphysics seriously because they do not make a clear enough distinction between how we understand the world and what the world is really like. Although they show that the behavioral and cognitive sciences are genuinely explanatory, it is not clear that they have shown that these special sciences identify properties that are genuinely causal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x04280141
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Meta-Problem of Change.Thomas Hofweber - 2009 - Noûs 43 (2):286 - 314.
Supervenience: Not Local and Not Two-Way.James Ladyman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):630-630.
Humean Metaphysics Versus a Metaphysics of Powers.Michael Esfeld - 2010 - In Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 119.
Leaving Metaphysics to Itself.Lilian Alweiss - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):349 – 365.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #178,142 of 2,328,130 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #95,745 of 2,328,130 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature