Really taking metaphysics seriously

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):632-633 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ross & Spurrett (R&S) fail to take metaphysics seriously because they do not make a clear enough distinction between how we understand the world and what the world is really like. Although they show that the behavioral and cognitive sciences are genuinely explanatory, it is not clear that they have shown that these special sciences identify properties that are genuinely causal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Meta-Problem of Change.Thomas Hofweber - 2009 - Noûs 43 (2):286 - 314.
Humean metaphysics versus a metaphysics of powers.Michael Esfeld - 2010 - In Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Time, chance and reduction: philosophical aspects of statistical mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 119.
¿Relaciones entre Metafísica y Arte?Paulo Vélez León - 2013 - Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía 48:131-138.
Supervenience: Not local and not two-way.James Ladyman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):630-630.
Psychological metaphysics.Peter Anthony White - 1993 - New York: Routledge.
Leaving metaphysics to itself.Lilian Alweiss - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):349 – 365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#235,877)

6 months
13 (#191,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Barbara Gail Montero
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references