Is faith in the Ultimate rationally required? Taking issue with some arguments in The Will to Imagine

Religious Studies 49 (2):209-220 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to J. L. Schellenberg, sceptical faith in the Ultimate is not merely permitted, but is rationally required. It is, all things considered, the response that we should make. In this article, I assess just three of Schellenberg's arguments for this bold conclusion. I explain why I find each of them unpersuasive

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Faith for the Future.Carl-Johan Palmqvist - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1):95-122.
Is sceptical religion adequate as a religion?Andrew Dole - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (2):235-248.
Beyond Belief : On the Nature and Rationality of Agnostic Religion.Carl-Johan Palmqvist - 2020 - Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University.
We Are Here to Help Each Other.Dustin Crummett - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (1):45-62.
Divine Hiddenness as Deserved.Travis Dumsday - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (3):286-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
35 (#103,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beyond Belief : On the Nature and Rationality of Agnostic Religion.Carl-Johan Palmqvist - 2020 - Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University.
Is There Something Worthwhile in Somethingism?Peter Gan - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):171-193.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references