Natural Kinds, Social Constructions, and Ordinary Language: Clarifying the Crisis in the Science of Emotion

Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2):247-269 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue for the importance of clarifying the distinction between metaphysical, semantic, and meta-semantic concerns regarding what Emotion is. This allows us to see that those involved in the Scientific Emotion Project and the Folk Emotion Project are in fact involved in the same project – the Science of Emotion. It also helps us understand why questions regarding the natural kind status of Emotion, as well as answers to questions regarding the value of ordinary language emotion terms or concepts to emotion research, will not help resolve the observed crisis in the Science of Emotion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-08

Downloads
115 (#159,226)

6 months
16 (#171,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cecilea Mun
Arizona State University (PhD)

Citations of this work

The Rationalities of Emotion.Cecilea Mun - 2016 - Phenomenology and Mind 2017 (11):48-57.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references