Life After Death: An Idle Wish or a Reasonable Hope?

Philosophy Research Archives 1:1-17 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue that life after death (understood as personal survival of one's death) is an appropriate object of one's hope, despite the fact that it may not be an appropriate object of one's belief. That is, the hope for life after death is a reasonable hope. Whereas the belief that there is a life after death may not be a justified belief.I begin by discussing and clarifying the phenomenon of hoping and developing a logical analysis of the concept of hope. Hoping is then distinguished from both wishing and believing. Next I discuss what must obtain before we consider a hope to be a reasonable one or to be justified. Finally I demonstrate that at least one form of life after death meets the conditions for justified hope.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Panpsychotheism.Paul Draper - 2017 - In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Religion. New York and London: Routledge. pp. 160-177.
Is There a Problem With False Hope?Bert Musschenga - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (4):423-441.
What May I Hope? Why It Can Be Rational to Rely on One’s Hope.Döring Sabine - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):117--129.
"Life" and "Death". An Inquiry into Essential Meaning of These Phenomena.Andrii Leonov - 2021 - Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal 22 (22):108-136.
Fostering hope in the face of death.Adam Kadlac - 2020 - Clinical Ethics 15 (4):167-174.


Added to PP

26 (#145,883)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Muyskens
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references