Ethnographic Insights Regarding the “Social Role” and “Moral Status” of the Fetus as “Patient”: Comparing Developed (United States & Sweden) and Developing (India) Countries

American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):50-52 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
19 (#145,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catherine Myser
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (2):230-231.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):402-406.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Maternal‐Fetal Dyad.Susan S. Mattingly - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (1):13-18.
Do embryonic “patients” have moral interests?Carson Strong - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):40 – 42.
The “Fetus as Patient”: A Critique.Stephen D. Brown - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):47-50.

View all 7 references / Add more references