- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The incoherence of agreeing to disagree
Theory and Decision 39 (3):219-239 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Agreeing to Disagree: Harsanyi and Aumann.Matthias Hild, Richard Jeffrey & Mathias Risse - 1997 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:109-115.
Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium.Robert F. Nau & Kevin F. McCardle - 1991 - Theory and Decision 31 (2-3):199-240.
The impossibility of experimental elicitation of subjective probabilities.Edi Karni & Zvi Safra - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (3):313-320.
Probabilities in decision rules.Paul Weirich - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James H. Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science: In Honor of Ellery Eells (1953-2006). Springer. pp. 289--319.
Subjective Probability: The Real Thing.Richard Jeffrey - 2002 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
A note on the decidability of de Finetti's coherence.Francesco Corielli - 1995 - Theory and Decision 38 (1):121-129.
A Note on the Equivalence of Coherence and Constrained Coherence.Paolo Vicig - 2016 - Minds and Machines 26 (3):303-305.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-01-22
Downloads
110 (#159,046)
6 months
6 (#700,858)
2013-01-22
Downloads
110 (#159,046)
6 months
6 (#700,858)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
De Finetti was Right: Probability Does Not Exist.Robert F. Nau - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.
Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium.Robert F. Nau & Kevin F. McCardle - 1991 - Theory and Decision 31 (2-3):199-240.
DeFinettian Consensus.L. G. Esteves, S. Wechsler, J. G. Leite & V. A. González-López - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (1):79-96.
References found in this work
Slightly more realistic personal probability.Ian Hacking - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (4):311-325.
Arbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium.Robert F. Nau & Kevin F. McCardle - 1991 - Theory and Decision 31 (2-3):199-240.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-7g5mb uwo