Emotional responses to fiction: Reply to Radford

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):75-78 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle, thought, and mimesis: Our responses to fiction.Sarah E. Worth - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (4):333-339.
Fiction Is Always (Or Never) Unlimited: A Reply to Wildman and Folde.Martin Ricksand - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (2):235-238.
Errors in ‘The History of an Error’.Simon Fokt & Aaron Meskin - 2016 - British Journal of Aesthetics 56 (2):179-185.
Art and Emotion.Hichem Naar - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Art and Desire: A Study of the Aesthetics of Fiction.Dabney Townsend - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):389-390.
Against them, too: A reply to Alward.Andrew Kania - 2007 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):404–408.
Radford and Allen on being moved by fiction: A rejoinder.William Charlton - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (4):391-394.
Reexperiencing fiction and non-fiction.Richard J. Gerrig - 1989 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (3):277-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#277,100)

6 months
11 (#310,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Neill
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

The Dog Ate It.Ephraim Nissan - 2011 - American Journal of Semiotics 27 (1-4):115-162.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references