Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics

Synthese 36 (1):97 - 131 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00485695

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the correct interpretation of p values and the importance of random variables.Guillaume Rochefort-Maranda - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1777-1793.
A frequentist interpretation of probability for model-based inductive inference.Aris Spanos - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1555-1585.
Bayesian and frequentist models: legitimate choices for different purposes of clinical research.Zackary Berger - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1045-1047.
A Battle in the Statistics Wars: a simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, Frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies.Mantas Radzvilas, William Peden & Francesco De Pretis - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):13689-13748.
Perspectival Realism and Frequentist Statistics: The Case of Jerzy Neyman’s Methodology and Philosophy.Adam P. Kubiak - unknown
Error and inference: an outsider stand on a frequentist philosophy.Christian P. Robert - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):447-461.
Frequentist statistical inference without repeated sampling.Paul Vos & Don Holbert - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-25.
Probability Models in Statistical Data Analysis: Uses, Interpretations, Frequentism-as-Model.Christian Hennig - 2024 - In Bharath Sriraman (ed.), Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Cham: Springer. pp. 1411-1458.
Statistical inference without frequentist justifications.Jan Sprenger - 2010 - In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. pp. 289--297.
Statistics‐based research – a pig in a poke?James Penston - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):862-867.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#67,315)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references