For the Sake of Argument? Do Deliberative Values Mandate Restriction of Freedom of Speech?

SATS 12 (1):60-79 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/sats.2011.005

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

For the Sake of Argument? Do Deliberative Values Mandate Restriction of Freedom of Speech?Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen - 2011 - SATS 12 (1):60-79.
Morten EJ Nielsen, ed. Political Questions: 5 Questions on Political Philosophy Reviewed by.Christoph Schmidt-Petri - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (5):359-361.
On Deliberative Democracy.Christian F. Rostbøll - 2001 - SATS 2 (2).
Democratization Through “Cancel Culture”—Three Levels of Artistic Freedom.Karsten Schubert - 2023 - In Konfliktuelle Kulturpolitik, Politologische Aufklärung – konstruktivistische Perspektiven. pp. 29-40.
Compossible Rights Must Restrict Speech.John T. H. Wong - 2022 - Dissertation, University of Hong Kong
Freedom of expression in commerce.Kenton F. Machina - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Constitutional restraints on the regulations of scientific speech and scientific research.Robert Post - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):431-438.
Free Speech.Susan Dwyer - 2001 - SATS 2 (2):80-97.
(Not So) Happy Cows: An Autonomy-Based Argument for Regulating Animal Industry Misleading Commercial Speech.Rubén Marciel & Pablo Magaña - forthcoming - Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Deliberative Democracy and Conceptions of Freedom.Christian Fogh Rostboll - 2004 - Dissertation, Columbia University

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
23 (#672,572)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Morten Nielsen
University of Copenhagen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
The autonomy defense of free speech.Susan Brison - 1998 - Ethics 108 (2):312-339.
Mill's deliberative utilitarianism.David O. Brink - 1992 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1):67-103.
Preferences and politics.Cass R. Sunstein - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1):3-34.
Mill on Liberty, Speech, and the Free Society.Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (3):276-309.

View all 7 references / Add more references