The Four-Dimensional World

Analysis 37 (1):32 - 39 (1976)
This paper defends the view of continuants as 'four-Dimensional worms' against an argument of geach's. This is to the effect that if continuants are four-Dimensional worms then their stages either do, Or do not, Fall under the very general terms satisfied by the continuants themselves (a stage of a man either is, Or is not, A man); but that either alternative is untenable. I try to show how the former alternative may be defended by appealing to some of geach's own ideas about identity; then go on to defend the four-Dimensionalist view from a criticism of it by d h mellor, And finish with an account of the intuitive distinction between process and continuant terms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/37.1.32
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,411
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

91 ( #52,575 of 1,924,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,761 of 1,924,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.