Euthanasia and the doctors--a rejection of the BMA's report

Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):124-128 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The working party on euthanasia set up by the British Medical Association produced its report in 1988 (1). The first of its terms of reference was 'to examine the ethical problems relating to euthanasia, terminal illness, and suicide' and as far as active voluntary euthanasia (AVE) is concerned it failed conspicuously to do its job. The purpose of this article is not to restate the case for AVE but to examine the reason for the failure. (Figures in square brackets refer to sections in the report.)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euthanasia in china: A report.Shi Pdau - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (2).
The BMA's torture report and afterwards.J. Dawson - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (Suppl):17-18.
Easeful death: is there a case for assisted dying?Mary Warnock - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Elisabeth Macdonald.
A rejection of doctors as moral guides.D. E. Ackroyd - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (3):147-147.
Patient doctors.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (5):2-2.
Doctors of interrogation.Jonathan H. Marks - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (4):17-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
26 (#599,088)

6 months
3 (#992,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references