Living within the Sacred Tension: Paradox and Its Significance for Christian Existence in the Thought of Søren Kierkegaard


Abstract
This dissertation presents an in-depth investigation into the notion of paradox and its significance for Christian existence in the thought of the Danish philosopher and theologian Søren Kierkegaard. The primary aim of the study is to explore and to develop various expressions of paradox in Kierkegaard’s authorship in order to demonstrate the manner by which Kierkegaard employs paradox as a means of challenging his Christendom contemporaries to exist as authentic Christians, and more specifically to enter into the existential state I am identifying in this project as living within the sacred tension. With this aim in mind, I begin with a discussion of Kierkegaard’s ethico-religious task in response to his Christendom culture and I provide a broad characterization of the notion of sacred tension as the telos of this task. For the majority of the study I then focus on four different expressions of paradox in Kierkegaard’s thought. These four expressions are: paradox that is associated with the faith of Abraham, paradox that is associated with the nature of the self and the task of selfhood, paradox that is associated with the God-man, and paradox that is associated with Christian love. In addition to arguing that Kierkegaard employs these expressions of paradox to help usher his contemporaries into a state of sacred tension, I also argue that such sacred tension can be understood in terms of various concrete Christian virtues. In this respect, I claim that Kierkegaard’s ethico-religious task is not merely negative or deconstructive in nature, but rather it is infused with the robust positive content associated with Kierkegaard’s particular understanding of Christianity. Viewing Kierkegaard’s thought and writings in this manner helps to reaffirm the significance of the notion of paradox in Kierkegaard’s thought and to highlight the value of the notion of sacred tension for a reassessment of both Kierkegaard’s existentialism and its contemporary implications.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant and Kierkegaard on Freedom and Evil.Alison Assiter - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 72:275-296.
The Paradox in Kierkegaard's Religiousness A.Richard Schmitt - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):118 – 135.
The Paradox of Inwardness in Kant and Kierkegaard.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (4):738-751.
Kierkegaard's Conception of the Eternal in His Climacean Works.Noel Stewart Adams - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
The Paradox at Reason’s Boundary.Martin DeNys - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:125-136.
Dialectic and Dialogue (Review).Michael Sullivan - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):200-203.
Kierkegaard as Religious Thinker.David J. Gouwens - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-20

Total views
4 ( #1,085,591 of 2,259,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #667,524 of 2,259,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature