Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):303-303 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This comment suggests that Pothos & Busmeyer (P&B) do not provide an intuitive rational foundation for quantum probability (QP) theory to parallel standard logic and classical probability (CP) theory. In particular, the intuitive foundation for standard logic, which underpins CP, is the elimination of contradictions – that is, believing p and not-p is bad. Quantum logic, which underpins QP, explicitly denies non-contradiction, which seems deeply counterintuitive for the macroscopic world about which people must reason. I propose a possible resolution in situation theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.James A. Hampton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):290 - 291.
What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?Daniel Joseph Navarro & Ian Fuss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):299-300.
Quantum probability and comparative cognition.Randolph C. Grace & Simon Kemp - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):287-287.
Physics envy: Trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.James Shanteau & David J. Weiss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):306-307.
Is quantum probability rational?Alasdair I. Houston & Karoline Wiesner - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):291 - 292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
34 (#123,329)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?