Analysis 72 (1):94-98 (2012)
Nicholas Shackel (2011) has proposed a number of arguments to save the Dipert–Bird model of physical reality from the sorts of unpalatable consequence I identified in Oderberg 2011. Some consequences, he thinks, are only apparent; others are real but palatable. In neither case does he seem to me to have deflected the concerns I raised, leaving graph structuralism on Dipert–Bird lines as problematic as ever
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Some Putative Graph-Theoretic Counterexamples to the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles.Rafael De Clercq - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):661-672.
Puppets and Pebbles and Ripples and Strings: Structuralism and Post-Structuralism Contrasted.Mike Fuller - 1996 - Cogito 10 (1):49-55.
Clark and Shackel on the Two-Envelope Paradox.Christopher J. G. Meacham & Jonathan Weisberg - 2003 - Mind 112 (448):685-689.
Isomorphisms and Nonisomorphisms of Graph Models.Harold Schellinx - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):227-249.
Isomorphism and Equational Equivalence of Continuous Λ-Models.Rainer Kerth - 1998 - Studia Logica 61 (3):403-415.
Using D-Separation to Calculate Zero Partial Correlations in Linear Models with Correlated Errors.Peter Spirtes, Thomas Richardson, Christopher Meek, Richard Scheines & Clark Glymour - unknown
The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph.Randall R. Dipert - 1997 - Journal of Philosophy 94 (7):329-358.
Added to index2011-12-09
Total downloads48 ( #109,931 of 2,177,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,201 of 2,177,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?