Philosophical Review 112 (2):247-250 (2003)
AbstractIn this book Robert Stecker sets out to answer three basic questions in the philosophy of art: What is art? What is it to understand a work of art? And what is the value of art? Stecker addresses each question in turn and delivers what he claims to be “a unified, if incomplete, philosophy of art—a theory of the nature and functions of art and of the practice of interpreting and appreciating it”. His strategy is to discuss thoroughly recent contributions to the debate concerning each of these questions and to put forward his own alternative answers. This leads to an extensive and detailed discussion of the journal literature on each of these subjects and considerable effort is spent both presenting and evaluating this literature.
Similar books and articles
The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics.John Dilworth - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
Persuasive definition.Andrew Aberdein - 1997 - In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale & A. V. Colman (eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric. Vale.
The Public Cost of Private Ownership of Artworks.Catharine Abell - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):76-81.
Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy.Nicolas de Warren - 2007 - Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.
Destroying Artworks.Marcus Rossberg - 2013 - In Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art & Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press.
Categories and Comparisons of Artworks.H. J. Pratt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Environmental Art and Ecological Citizenship.Jason Simus - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (1):21-36.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads