Philosophy 95 (1):63-91 (2020)
AbstractThe idea of predistribution has the potential to offer a valuable and distinctive approach to political philosophers, political scientists, and economists, in thinking about social justice and the creation of more egalitarian economies. It is also an idea that has drawn the interest of politicians of the left and centre-left, promising an alternative to traditional forms of social democracy. But the idea of predistribution is not well understood, and stands in need of elucidation. This article explores ways of drawing the conceptual and normative distinction between predistribution and redistribution, examining those general categories when considering the roles of public services and fiscal transfers, and looking at the ways in which government policies can empower and disempower different individuals and groups within the economy. This article argues that the most initially plausible and common-sensical ways of drawing the distinction between predistributive and redistributive public policies collapse when put under analytical pressure. It concludes that the distinction between predistribution and redistribution is best seen in terms of the aims or effects of policies rather than a deeper division of policy types, and argues that, once seen in those terms, predistribution is a central concern of social justice.
Similar books and articles
The Promise of Predistribution.Martin O'Neill - 2012 - Policy Network - Predistribution and the Crisis in Living Standards.
The illusory distinction between re- and predistribution.Åsbjørn Melkevik - 2021 - Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 16 (1):41-56.
Piketty, Meade and Predistribution.Martin O'Neill - forthcoming - Crooked Timber Book Seminar on Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
Justice, Power, and Participatory Socialism: on Piketty’s Capital and Ideology.Martin O’Neill - 2021 - Analyse & Kritik 43 (1):89-124.
‘Predistribution’, property-owning democracy and land value taxation.Gavin Kerr - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (1):67-91.
Property-owning democracy as an alternative to capitalism.Paul Raekstad - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (4):614-622.
Catholic Social Justice and NETWORK’s Political Ministry.Simone Campbell - 2018 - Praxis: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Faith and Justice 1 (1):17-28.
On Sen on comparative justice.Chandran Kukathas - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):196-204.
Justice and Power in Sociolegal Studies.Bryant G. Garth & Austin Sarat (eds.) - 1998 - American Bar Foundation.
Systemic domination as ground of justice.Jugov Tamara - 2020 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (1).
Justice and Feasibility: A Dynamic Approach.Pablo Gilabert - 2017 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. Oxford University Press. pp. 95-126.
Justice, Legitimacy, and (Normative) Authority for Political Realists.Enzo Rossi - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):149-164.
Alan Thomas, Republic of Equals: Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy.Lisa Herzog - 2019 - Ethics 129 (3):497-501.
All Justice is Social but it’s not all Social Justice.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):383-395.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Buying Time – The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism.[author unknown] - 2014
What should egalitarians believe?Martin O'neill - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):119-156.
Survey Article: Philosophy and Public Policy after Piketty.Martin O'Neill - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (3):343-375.