Dialectica 70 (1):3-27 (2016)

Authors
Andrea Onofri
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
Abstract
Two general principles have played a crucial role in the recent debate on concepts. On the one hand, we want to allow different subjects to have the same concepts, thus accounting for concept publicity: concepts are ‘the sort of thing that people can, and do, share’. On the other hand, a subject who finds herself in a so-called ‘Frege case’ appears to have different concepts for the same object: for instance, Lois Lane has two distinct concepts SUPERMAN and CLARK KENT which refer to the same person. Several theories have tried to meet both of these constraints at the same time. But should we really try to satisfy both principles? This paper will argue that the traditional project of fulfilling these two constraints has been a misguided one. Through a variation on classic identity mistake cases, I will show that our two desiderata are inconsistent: it would thus be impossible to incorporate both of them in our best theory of concepts.
Keywords Concepts  Publicity  Fregean Constraint  Inferential Role theories  Atomistic theories
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1746-8361.12125
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,448
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
A Puzzle About Belief.Saul A. Kripke - 1979 - In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use. Reidel. pp. 239--83.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Publicity of Thought.Andrea Onofri - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272).
Frege Puzzles and Mental Files.Henry Clarke - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):351-366.
Mental Files and Rational Inferences.Andrea Onofri - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):378-392.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conceiving of Conscious States.Christopher Peacocke - 2012 - In J. Ellis & D. Guevara (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Is a Unified Account of Concepts Possible?James David Byrd - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Davis
Concepts and Meaning in Medieval Philosophy.Stephen Read - 1999 - Philosophy and Theology 8:1-20.
A Defense of Conceptual Pluralism.Daniel Aaron Weiskopf - 2003 - Dissertation, Washington University
Epistemic Boundedness and the Universality of Thought.Matthew Rellihan - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (2):219-250.
Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Nature of Concepts: An Essay in Metaphysics.Daniel Workman Barwick - 1997 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
In Search of Concepts.Katia Saporiti - 2010 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 81 (1):153-172.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-19

Total views
108 ( #98,529 of 2,445,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #56,156 of 2,445,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes