Dagfinn f0llesdal

In J. H. Fetzer & P. Humphreys (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 270--181 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The new theory of reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its origins. [REVIEW]Jc Beall - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):308 – 309.
Quentin Smith.A. Reply to Scott Soames - 1998 - In J. H. Fetzer & P. Humphreys (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 37.
Scott Soames.I. Quotation - 1998 - In J. H. Fetzer & P. Humphreys (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 270--65.
Quentin Smith.Ruth Barcan Marcus - 1998 - In J. H. Fetzer & P. Humphreys (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 3.
Quentin Smith.A. Posteriori - 1998 - In J. H. Fetzer & P. Humphreys (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its Origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 270--137.
Revisionism about Reference: A Reply to Smith.Scott Soames - 1998 - In Paul Humphreys & James Fetzer (eds.), The New Theory of Reference: Kripke, Marcus, and its origins. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 13--35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references