On behalf of the fool

Analysis 71 (2):304-306 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper responds to a previous paper by Gary Matthews and Lynne Rudder Baker. Their paper, in turn, was a response to my reply to an even earlier paper of theirs. (The relevant bibliographical details are in this paper.) They claim to have a new, improved, simple ontological argument. I argue that the new, simple ontological argument is not, in any way, improved.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/anr015

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In behalf of 'in behalf of the fool'.Patrick Grim - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):33 - 42.
Reply on Behalf of the Fool.Gaunilo of Marmoutiers - 1997 - In Thomas Williams (ed.), Anselm: Basic Writings. Hackett. pp. 99-104.
Objection to a simplified ontological argument.G. Oppy - 2011 - Analysis 71 (1):105-106.
On behalf of the fool.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In John Angus Campbell & Stephen C. Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, design, and public education. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. pp. 475--485.
St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.Saint Anselm - 1979 - University of Notre Dame Press.
St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.M. J. Charlesworth (ed.) - 1965 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Proslogium; monologium; gaunilon's on behalf of the fool. Anselm - unknown
St. Anselm's Proslogion, with A Reply on Behalf of the Fool and The Author's Reply to Gaunilo.J. Charlesworth - 1967 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 22 (1):82-83.
St. Anselm's proslogion with a reply on behalf of the fool by gaunilo and the author's reply to gaunilo.J. D. Cloud - 1966 - Philosophical Books 7 (1):13-16.
St. Anselm's Proslogion with A reply on behalf of the fool.Maxwell John Charlesworth - 1979 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by M. J. Charlesworth, Gaunilo & Anselm.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-30

Downloads
321 (#65,568)

6 months
84 (#67,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Against an Updated Ontological Argument.Eric Yang - 2017 - Res Philosophica 95 (1):179-187.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reply to Oppy's fool.G. B. Matthews & L. R. Baker - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):303-303.

Add more references