Why I Am a Presentist

Science in Context 26 (4):595-609 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both geologists and historians study the past, but they have divergent views of the present. Geologists are unambiguously presentist. They believe that the observable present is a crucial resource in understanding the past, because in the observable present we can see and study the processes that have occurred in the unobservable past. For geologists, it is largely uncontroversial that the past not only can but should be interpreted with reference to the present.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Defense of Presentism.Mark Hinchliff - 1988 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Presentist History for Pluralist Science.Hasok Chang - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (1):97-114.
Hermeneutical contributions to the history of science: Gadamer on ‘presentism’.Oscar Moro Abadía - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):372-380.
The Reality of the Past.S. Alexander - 2021 - In A. R. J. Fisher (ed.), Marking the Centenary of Samuel Alexander’s Space, Time and Deity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 41-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
73 (#220,108)

6 months
13 (#278,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?