Parsimonious feedback

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):51-52 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The insistence on strict seriality and the proscription of feedback in phonological encoding place counterproductive limitations on the theory and WEAVER ++ model. Parsimony cannot be stipulated as a property of the language system itself. Lifting the methodological prohibition on feedback would allow free exploration of its functionality in relation to the substantial content of this major research program

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feedback consistency effects.Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization?Trevor A. Harley - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):45-45.
Features and feedback.Tobey L. Doeleman, Joan A. Sereno, Allard Jongman & Sara C. Sereno - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-329.
Merging speech perception and production.Antje S. Meyer & Willem J. M. Levelt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):339-340.
Purpose, feedback, and evolution.Arthur E. Falk - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217.
Feedback: A general mechanism in the brain.Marie Montant - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):340-341.
Information, feedback, and transparency.Robert Van Gulick - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):27-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#791,096)

6 months
19 (#182,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references