Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):765-771 (2013)
AbstractObjective Adolescents have had very limited access to research on biomedical prevention interventions despite high rates of HIV acquisition. One concern is that adolescents are a vulnerable population, and trials carry a possibility of harm, requiring investigators to take additional precautions. Of particular concern is preventive misconception, or the overestimation of personal protection that is afforded by enrolment in a prevention intervention trial. Methods As part of a larger study of preventive misconception in adolescent HIV vaccine trials, we interviewed 33 male and female 16–19-year-olds who have sex with men. Participants underwent a simulated HIV vaccine trial consent process, and then completed a semistructured interview about their understanding and opinions related to enrolment in a HIV vaccine trial. A grounded theory analysis looked for shared concepts, and focused on the content and process of adolescent participants’ understanding of HIV vaccination and the components of preventive misconception, including experiment, placebo and randomisation. Results Across interviews, adolescents demonstrated active processing of information, in which they questioned the interviewer, verbally worked out their answers based upon information provided, and corrected themselves. We observed a wide variety of understanding of research concepts. While most understood experiment and placebo, fewer understood randomisation. All understood the need for safer sex even if they did not understand the more basic concepts. Conclusions Education about basic concepts related to clinical trials, time to absorb materials and assessment of understanding may be necessary in future biomedical prevention trials
Similar books and articles
Hiv Vaccine Trials: Reconsidering the Therapeutic Misconception and the Question of What Constitutes Trial Related Injuries.Udo Schüklenk & Richard Ashcroft - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (3):ii–iv.
Response to Hiv Vaccine Trials: Reconsidering the Therapeutic Misconception and the Question of What Constitutes Trial-Related Injuries.1.Catherine Slack & Melissa Stobie - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):159-161.
Hiv Preventive Vaccine Research: Selected Ethical Issues.Christine Grady - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):595-612.
Enrolling Adolescents in HIV Vaccine Trials: Reflections on Legal Complexities From South Africa.Catherine Slack, Ann Strode, Theodore Fleischer, Glenda Gray & Chitra Ranchod - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
Ethical Considerations in International HIV Vaccine Trials: Summary of a Consultative Process Conducted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).D. Guenter - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (1):37-43.
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Intertwining Biomedical Research and Public Health in HIV Microbicide Research.R. Macklin - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (3):199-209.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
Stakeholder Perspectives on Ethical Challenges in Hiv Vaccine Trials in South Africa.Zaynab Essack, Jennifer Koen, Nicola Barsdorf, Catherine Slack, Michael Quayle, Cecilia Milford, Graham Lindegger, Chitra Ranchod & Richard Mukuka - 2010 - Developing World Bioethics 10 (1):11-21.
Convergent Ethical Issues in HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Vaccine Trials in Africa: Report From the WHO/UNAIDS African AIDS Vaccine Programme's Ethics, Law and Human Rights Collaborating Centre Consultation, 10-11 February 2009, Durban, South Africa. [REVIEW]Nicole Mamotte, Douglas Wassenaar, Jennifer Koen & Zaynab Essack - 2010 - BMC Medical Ethics 11 (1):3-.
Ethical Perspectives on Surveillance and Preventive Strategies for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.Mojalefa Johannes Koenane - unknown
Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings: Table 1.Leslie London, Ashraf Kagee, Keymanthri Moodley & Leslie Swartz - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):286-293.
Views of the Process and Content of Ethical Reviews of Hiv Vaccine Trials Among Members of Us Institutional Review Boards and South African Research Ethics Committees.Robert Klitzman - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):207-218.
The HIV/AIDS Pandemic, African Traditional Values and the Search for a Vaccine in Africa.Godfrey B. Tangwa - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (2):217 – 230.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Using Cognitive Interviews to Enhance Measurement in Empirical Bioethics: Developing a Measure of the Preventive Misconception in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials.Jeremy Sugarman, Damon M. Seils, J. Kemp Watson-Ormond & Kevin P. Weinfurt - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (1):17-23.
Preventive Misconception and Risk Behaviors in a Multinational HIV Prevention Trial.Jeremy Sugarman, Li Lin, Jared M. Baeten, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Elizabeth R. Brown, Flavia Matovu Kiweewa, Nyaradzo M. Mgodi, Gonasagrie Nair, Samantha Siva, Damon M. Seils & Kevin P. Weinfurt - 2019 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 10 (2):79-87.
Avoiding a Tyranny of the Majority: Public Deliberation as Citizen Science, Sensitive Issues, and Vulnerable Populations.Mary A. Ott & Amelia S. Knopf - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):28-31.
Engaging the “Citizen” in Citizen Science: Who’s Actually Included?Hina Walajahi - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (8):31-33.
References found in this work
No references found.