Monash Bioethics Review 22 (1):8-17 (2003)

Authors
Abstract
Plural democratic societies encourage and require the tolerance of disparate views. However, in relation to contentious areas like assisted reproductive technologies and destructive embryo research, tolerance is strained by the normative force of our fundamental beliefs about the moral status of early human forms. Yet in the continuing debates, spokespersons for different positions often do not concede all the implications of their arguments, may sidestep the real moral issues, and can fail to be clear about the foundations on which their arguments and policy advice ultimately rely. Guidelines and statutes can be rendered incoherent by the desire to balance and satisfy opposing values, rather than honestly reflecting the primary values they espouse.I call for greater clarity and honesty as these issues continue to be debated. An uncritical adherence to pluralism will encourage strategic obfuscation, but citizens of democracies need to be clearly informed about all the premises of opposing positions. Decisions about ethically and legally acceptable reproductive technologies ultimately depend on support for one metaphysical grounding at the expense of another. This should be acknowledged, as should its implications for policy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/bf03351383
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
Embryonic Stem Cell Patents and Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (3):211-222.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Norman Ford - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (4):4.
Stem Cells, Altered Nuclear Transfer & Ethics.Norman Ford - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):9.
Embryos and Eagles: Symbolic Value in Research and Reproduction.Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (1):22-34.
Research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells and Cloning for Stem Cells.Michel Revel - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (1):4-14.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-12

Total views
5 ( #1,151,701 of 2,432,760 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,144 of 2,432,760 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes