Ethics and Information Technology 2 (3):181-187 (2000)
AbstractWhile maintaining the importance of privacy for critical evaluations of surveillance technologies, I suggest that privacy also constrains the debate by framing analyses in terms of the individual. Public space provides a site for considering what is at stake with surveillance technologies besides privacy. After describing two accounts of privacy and one of public space, I argue that surveillance technologies simultaneously add an ambiguityand a specificity to public places that are detrimental to the social, cultural, and civic importance of these places. By making public places accessible to other places and/or times, surveillance technologies make these social contexts ambiguous by blurring their spatial and temporal bounds. At the same time, surveillancetechnologies valence public places in functionally specificways that are detrimental to informal civic life. To complement defensive approaches to surveillance technologies based onindividual privacy, I conclude by suggesting how sociality as a relational value or an ethics of place as a contextual value could provide a proactive line of reasoning for affirming the value ofthat which is between people and places.
Similar books and articles
But Murderers Can Have All the Children They Want: Surrogacy and Public Policy.Byron Chell - 1988 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (1).
Surveillance, Privacy and the Ethics of Vehicle Safety Communication Technologies.M. Zimmer - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):201-210.
The Difference Between Lonely Old Ladies and CCTV Cameras: A Response to Ryberg.Benjamin Goold - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (1):43-47.
PETs and their users: a critical review of the potentials and limitations of the privacy as confidentiality paradigm. [REVIEW]Seda Gürses - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):539-563.
Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Ethics, Public Policy, and Managing Advanced Technologies: The Case of Electronic Surveillance. [REVIEW]Edward J. Ottensmeyer & Mark A. Heroux - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):519 - 526.
Privacy, Democracy and the Politics of Disease Surveillance.Amy L. Fairchild, Ronald Bayer & James Colgrove - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):30-38.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185–200.
Privacy in Public: A Democratic Defense.Titus Stahl - 2020 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 7 (1):73-96.
Privacy and Social Interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
A Practice–Theoretical Account of Privacy.Wulf Loh - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (4):233-247.
Public Anonymity and the Connected World.Tony Doyle & Judy Veranas - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (3):207-218.
References found in this work
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.Carol Gilligan - 1982 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.