The Effects of Sin upon Human Moral Cognition

Journal of Reformed Theology 4 (1):42-69 (2010)
Abstract
This article provides an elaborate defense of the thesis that we have no reason to think that sin has any direct effects upon our moral cognition. After a few methodological comments and conceptual distinctions, the author treats certain biblical passages on humans' evil hearts, the function of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in Genesis 2 and 3, Paul's comments on the moral situation of the Gentiles in Romans 2, and Paul's ideas on the Gentiles' futility of mind as found in Ephesians 4. The most that can be concluded from these passages is that sin has not damaged human moral cognitive faculties to such an extent that they function insufficiently to hold people morally responsible. The author also argues that it is a consequence of sin that humans have knowledge by acquaintance of sin, and that it is only by divine revelation that humans recognize certain morally reprehensible acts, beliefs, and emotions as sinful. Finally, it is briefly argued that we have good reason to think that sin has certain indirect effects upon our moral cognition.
Keywords Consequences of Sin  Human Cognition  Moral Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sin and Human Cognition of God.Rik Peels - 2011 - Scottish Journal of Theology 64 (4):390-409.
Taking Sin Seriously.Darlene Fozard Weaver - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):45 - 74.
Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.William S. Babcock - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28-55.
Kant on the Debt of Sin.Lawrence Pasternack - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (1):30-52.
The Metaphysics of Original Sin.Michael C. Rea - 2007 - In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Persons: Human and Divine. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ;. pp. 319--356.
Boethius on Human Freedom.Paul J. LaChance - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):309-327.
Anselm Against McCann On God and Sin.Katherin A. Rogers - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):397-415.
Spiritual-Moral Aspect in Investigation of Personality's Psychological Defense.Anna Koteneva - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:255-262.
Specters of Sin and Salvation.Annika Thiem - 2010 - Idealistic Studies 40 (1/2):117-138.
Moral Personality, Perversity, and Original Sin.James Wetzel - 1995 - Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):3 - 25.
Leibniz on the Labyrinth of Freedom.Jack D. Davidson - 2003 - The Leibniz Review 13:19-43.
God, Sin, and Rogers on Anselm.Hugh J. McCann - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (4):420-431.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-02

Total downloads

33 ( #152,232 of 2,153,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums