Two assumptions in legal discourse: To answer for self and to tell the truth

Semiotica 2016 (209):15-30 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Name der Zeitschrift: Semiotica Jahrgang: 2016 Heft: 209 Seiten: 15-30

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/sem-2016-0017

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hidden cultures in law: Metaphor and translation in legal discourse.Paolo Stefanì - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (209):357-370.
The Limits of Institutionalised Legal Discourse.Emmanuel Melissaris - 2005 - Ratio Juris 18 (4):464-483.
Rights, responsibilities, and resistance: Legal discourse and intervention legislation in the Northern Territory in Australia.Peter Gale - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (209):167-185.
Uncovering hidden meanings in legal discourse on the elderly: A semioethical perspective.Rosana Do Carmo Novaes-Pinto & Marcus Vinicius Borges Oliveira - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (209):301-321.
Fictionalising Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Strong Legal Fictionalism.David Gawthorne - 2013 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 38:52-73.
The integrity of discourse in the anglican eucharistic tradition: A consideration of philosophical assumptions.Terence Lovat Brian Douglas - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (5):847-861.
The integrity of discourse in the anglican eucharistic tradition: A consideration of philosophical assumptions.Brian Douglas & Terence Lovat - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (5):847-861.
Global Error and Legal Truth.Brian H. Bix - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (3):535-547.
Beyond the Legal Vernacular: Linguistic Content, Truth and Strategy in Legal Discourse.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (3):635-643.
Questions of Meaning: A Discourse Theoretic Alternative to Truth Conditional Semantics for the Interrogative Mood.Thomas Paul Urbach - 1991 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Legal Theory and Legal Doctrinal Scholarship.Mátyás Bódig - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):483-514.
Tarskian truth and the correspondence theory.Luis Fern & Ndez Moreno - 2001 - Synthese 126 (1-2):123-147.
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory.Eveline T. Feteris - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):139-159.
Dworkin and the Possibility of Objective Moral Truth.Michael Walschots - 2010 - Gnosis 11 (1):1-16.
Formal legal truth and substantive truth in judicial fact-finding -- their justified divergence in some particular cases.Robert S. Summers - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):497 - 511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-27

Downloads
11 (#1,130,421)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Law Challenged and the Critique of Identity with Emmanuel Levinas.Susan Petrilli - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (1):31-69.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references