Do extraordinary claims really require extraordinary evidence?

In K. Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To what extend does David Hume's argument about miracles inform modern skepticism about pseudoscience?

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Need Miracles Be Extraordinary?Robert Hambourger - 1987 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (3):435-449.
Hume on the evidential impossibility of miracles.Dennis M. Ahern - 1975 - American Philosophical Quarterly:1 - 31.
Contrary miracles concluded.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1985 - Hume Studies 1985 (Supplement):1 - 14.
Bayes, Hume, and Miracles.John Earman - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Marvels, miracles, and mundane order.S. Buckle - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):1 – 31.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Hume on miracles: Interpretation and criticism.James E. Taylor - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (4):611–624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-07

Downloads
989 (#13,122)

6 months
72 (#59,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?Yonatan I. Fishman - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):813-837.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references