History, Infanticide, and Imperiled Newborns

Hastings Center Report 18 (4):14-17 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethicists who advocate the permissibility of infanticide often have misrepresented history in their arguments. The Western tradition supports the prohibition of active killing of congenitally impaired or premature newborns whose futures are uncertain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Imperiled Newborns.Kathleen Nolan - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (6):5-32.
Imperiled Newborns.Arthur Caplan & Cynthia B. Cohen - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (6):5.
On the Care of Imperiled Newborns.Thomas H. Murray - 1984 - Hastings Center Report 14 (2):24-24.
Killing fetuses and killing newborns.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5):19-20.
Imperiled Newborns Raise Moral Doubts.William G. Bartholome - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (1):46-47.
Impaired Newborns and The Hardship on Parents.Alan Gartner - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (3):43-43.
Infanticide in History.Sg Post - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 19 (5):48-48.
Infanticide in History.Gershon B. Grunfeld - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (5):48-48.
The Final, Anticlimactic Rude on Baby Doe.Thomas H. Murray - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (3):5-9.
Abortion and Infanticide.Christina Hoff Sommers & Michael Tooley - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (3):39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#155,087)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references