Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics

Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (2):217 - 232 (1992)

Authors
Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00248640
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,928
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Four-Valued Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals).Greg Restall - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (2):139 - 160.
Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Relational Proof System for Relevant Logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
On Permutation in Simplified Semantics.Greg Restall & Tony Roy - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):333 - 341.
Neighborhoods for Entailment.Lou Goble - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):483-529.
Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady (eds.) - 1982 - Ridgeview Pub. Co..
Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and Some of Their Rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #122,972 of 2,319,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #117,280 of 2,319,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature