Utilitas 18 (1):20-32 (2006)

Abstract
While there is much common ground between the writings of Amartya Sen and John Stuart Mill – particularly in their advocacy of freedom and gender equality – one is a critic, while the other is an advocate, of utilitarianism. In spite of this contrast, there are strong echoes of Sen's capability approach in Mill's writings. Inasmuch as Mill sees the capability to be happy as important he holds a form of capability approach. He also thinks of happiness as constituted by the exercise of certain capabilities (including the higher faculties). Furthermore, Mill addresses the possibility that people can adapt to limited opportunity, which is central to Sen's critique of some ‘utility’-based views. By contrasting contentment and happiness Mill suggests one way in which a utilitarian might address cases of adaptation. His discussions of capabilities and of adaptation are consistent with his utilitarianism. (Published Online February 16 2006).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820805001809
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Identity, Reason and Choice.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2014 - Economics and Philosophy 30 (1):11-33.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
147 ( #79,426 of 2,504,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,949 of 2,504,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes