The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (1):9-27 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the place of vulnerability in our lives? The current debate about the ethics of enhancement technologies provides a context in which to think about this question. In my view, the current debate is likely to be fruitless, largely because we bring the wrong ethical resources to bear on its questions. In this article, I recall an important, but currently neglected, role that moral concepts play in our thinking, a role they should especially play in relation to the introduction of new technologies. I call this the ‘contemplative role of moral concepts’. I then contrast two approaches to the contemplative role of moral concepts which are found in the current literature, and show why it is important to keep in mind both of these approaches when thinking about human vulnerability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Radical enhancement as a moral status de-enhancer.Jesse Gray - 2020 - Monash Bioethics Review 1 (2):146-165.
Body and the Limit of Human Enhancement.Jin-Woo Lee - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 65:49-53.
The role of vulnerability in Kantian ethics.Paul Formosa - 2013 - In Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers & Susan Dodds (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. New York: Oup Usa. pp. 88-109.
Human freedom and enhancement.Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Katja Crone - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):13-21.
Governmentality, Biopower, and the Debate over Genetic Enhancement.L. McWhorter - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (4):409-437.
Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels.Florencia Luna - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-04

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
41 (#98,786)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Quilter
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

Human vulnerability in medical contexts.Steve Matthews & Bernadette Tobin - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (1):1-7.
The Better I Can Be: In Defence of Human Enhancement for a New Genetic Equality.Vera Lúcia Carapeto Raposo - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics without principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Good and evil: an absolute conception.Raimond Gaita - 1991 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Is there a problem with enhancement?Frances M. Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.
Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception.Michael McGhee - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (170):110-112.

View all 9 references / Add more references