Motivation's Pick-Me-Upper: Enhancing Performance Through Motivation-Enhancing Drugs

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (1):50-51 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Torben Kjærsgaard’s argues that the term “cognitive enhancement substances” is an inappropriate term considering that stimulants do not enhance cognition, but rather only enhance motivation. Therefore, he concludes that stimulants are best described as “performance maintenance” and not “performance enhancement.” I challenge his conclusion on the grounds that both life’s ordinary, daily activities and life’s extraordinary activities are types of performances necessary for living the kinds of lives that we want to live, which can be enhanced, not just maintained, with the effects of cognitive enhancing substances. “Cognitive enhancing substances” may be a misleading term, but referring to the effects of cognitive enhancing substances as “performance maintenance,” rather than “performance enhancing,” misguidedly minimizes the role that motivation plays into our self-determined lives.

Similar books and articles

Is WADA creating and then prosecuting thought crimes?Jo Morrison & Eric Moore - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 50 (3):402-418.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-02

Downloads
610 (#30,550)

6 months
77 (#74,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keisha Ray
University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Smart Policy: Cognitive Enhancement and the Public Interest.Nick Bostrom - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell.
Smart Policy.Nick Bostrom & Rebecca Roache - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 138–149.

Add more references