Hili Razinsky
Universidade de Lisboa
Ambivalence is often presented through cases of defeated ambivalence and multivalence, in which opposed attitudes suggest mutual isolation and defeat each other. Properly understood, however, ambivalence implies the existence of poles that are conflictually yet rationally interlinked and are open to non-defeated joint conduct. This paper considers cases that range from indecisiveness and easy adoption of conflicting attitudes, to tragically conflicted deliberation and to cases of shifting between self-deceptively serious attitudes. Analyzing such cases as variants of defeated ambivalence, I argue that the phenomena of defeated ambivalence are marginal to ambivalence even though they are by the same token exemplary of it. The poles in such cases are connected as opposing attitudes in such a way that the attitudes and the opposition are both undermined. The article focuses on two forms of vague multivalence, one of which is taken from Heidegger’s analysis of curiosity.
Keywords rationality mental attitudes  ambivalence mental conflict  hesitation paralysis stagnancy vacillation confusion irrationality duality split  tragic conflicts greek tragedy Nussbaum Heidegger curiosity Kierkegaard Frankfurt will  weakness of the will akrasia hunger buridan's ass decision indecition choice options  vague multivalence art Michelange aesthetics agency action intentionality desires emotions  rationality irrationality Davidson Stambaugh inaction practical rationality inconsstnecy the self person personhood
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ipq2020602151
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Behavioral Conflict of Emotion.Hili Razinsky - 2014 - International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2):159-173.
An Outline for Ambivalence of Value Judgment.Hili Razinsky - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (3):469-488.
Conscious Ambivalence.Hili Razinsky - 2016 - Human Studies 39 (3):365–384.
Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration.Hili Razinsky - 2016 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Swindell, Frankfurt, and Ambivalence.David Svolba - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):219 - 225.
Ambivalence, Emotional Perceptions, and the Concern with Objectivity.Hili Razinsky - 2017 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):211-228.
A Phenomenological Investigation of the Experience of Ambivalence.Steve Harrist - 2006 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 37 (1):85-114.
Is Ambivalence an Agential Vice?Jacqui Poltera - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):293-305.
Ambivalence.J. S. Swindell Blumenthal-Barby - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):23 – 34.
The Ethics of Collaborative Ambivalence.Amelie Rorty - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):391-403.
The Openness of Attitudes and Action in Ambivalence.Hili Razinsky - 2015 - South African Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):79-92.
Ambivalence.J. S. Swindell - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):23-34.
In Defense of Ambivalence and Alienation.Logi Gunnarsson - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):13-26.


Added to PP index

Total views
35 ( #292,853 of 2,412,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #121,582 of 2,412,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes