Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):253-278 (2010)
For the sake of developing and evaluating public policy decisions aimed at combating terrorism, we need a precise public definition of terrorism that distinguishes terrorism from other forms of violence. Ordinary usage does not provide a basis for such a definition, and so it must be stipulative. I propose essentially pragmatic criteria for developing such a stipulative public definition. After noting that definitions previously proposed in the philosophical literature are inadequate based on these criteria, I propose an alternative, which I call the 'group-target' definition and which distinguishes terrorism from other forms of violence by the distinctive principle of discrimination used by terrorists to identify legitimate targets. I argue that this definition meets the criteria for a satisfactory public definition, and suggest that based on it there is good reason to suspect the adequacy of anti-terrorism policies that rely predominantly on forceful interdiction of terrorists
|Keywords||PUBLIC POLICY IDEOLOGY ANTI-TERRORISM POLICIES TERRORISM ESSENTIALLY CONTESTED CONCEPTS DEFINITION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Terrorism and Collective Responsibility.Seumas Miller - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):263-281.
Terrorism Against Non-Innocents: The Ethical Implications.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2010 - In Paul Omoyefa (ed.), Basic Applied Ethics. VDM.
The Curious Element of Motive in Definitions of Terrorism: Essential Ingredient - or Criminalising Thought?Ben Saul - unknown
Three Prejudices Against Terrorism.Shawn Kaplan - 2009 - Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2):181-199.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads51 ( #99,917 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?