From ancient consolation and negative care to modern empathy and the neurosciences

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):25-32 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A historical understanding of the virtue of consolation, as contrasted to empathy, compassion, or sympathy, is developed. Recent findings from neuroscience are presented which support and affirm this understanding. These findings are related to palliative care and its current practice in bioethics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Empathy.Jakob Eklund - 2013 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 20 (1):28-38.
In Defense of the Moral Significance of Empathy.Aaron Simmons - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):97-111.
Similarity versus familiarity: When empathy becomes selfish.Elias L. Khalil - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):41-41.
Depth psychology, death and the hermeneutic of empathy.George B. Hogenson - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):67-90.
The Nature of Consolation in The Consolation of Philosophy.John R. Fortin - 2004 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):293-307.
The desired moral attitude of the physician: (I) empathy. [REVIEW]Petra Gelhaus - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):103-113.
Empathy, sympathy, care.Stephen Darwall - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 89 (2-3):261–282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
43 (#367,656)

6 months
4 (#776,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the problem of empathy.Edith Stein - 1986 - Washington, D.C.: ICS Publications.
On the Problem of Empathy.Edith Stein - 1964 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 28 (4):547-547.

View all 12 references / Add more references