The philosophical case for open theism

Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to defend open theism vis-à-vis its main competitors within the family of broadly classical theisms, namely, theological determinism and the various forms of non-open free-will theism, such as Molinism and Ockhamism. After isolating two core theses over which open theists and their opponents differ, I argue for the open theist position on both points. Specifically, I argue against theological determinists that there are future contingents. And I argue against non-open free-will theists that future contingency is incompatible with the future’s being epistemically settled for God. This paper is a follow-up to the author’s Rhoda (Religious Studies, 2008) which was delivered during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
178 (#69,702)

6 months
3 (#208,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Rhoda
Christian Theological Seminary

References found in this work

Papers on Time and Tense.Arthur Norman Prior - 1968 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
God, Time, and Knowledge.William Hasker - 1989 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge.Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references