The philosophical case for open theism

Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The goal of this paper is to defend open theism vis-à-vis its main competitors within the family of broadly classical theisms, namely, theological determinism and the various forms of non-open free-will theism, such as Molinism and Ockhamism. After isolating two core theses over which open theists and their opponents differ, I argue for the open theist position on both points. Specifically, I argue against theological determinists that there are future contingents. And I argue against non-open free-will theists that future contingency is incompatible with the future’s being epistemically settled for God. This paper is a follow-up to the author’s Rhoda (Religious Studies, 2008) which was delivered during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

178 (#69,702)

6 months
3 (#208,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Rhoda
Christian Theological Seminary

References found in this work

Papers on Time and Tense.Arthur Norman Prior - 1968 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
God, Time, and Knowledge.William Hasker - 1989 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The Dilemma of Freedom and Foreknowledge.Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references