Journal of the History of Biology 37 (1):25 - 38 (2004)

Robert Richards
University of Chicago
The eminent historian and philosopher of biology, Michael Ruse, has written several books that explore the relationship of evolutionary theory to its larger scientific and cultural setting. Among the questions he has investigated are: Is evolution progressive? What is its epistemological status? Most recently, in "Darwin and Design: Does Evolution have a Purpose?," Ruse has provided a history of the concept of teleology in biological thinking, especially in evolutionary theorizing. In his book, he moves quickly from Plato and Aristotle to Kant and such British thinkers as Paley and Whewell. His main focus, though, is on Darwin's theory and its subsequent fate. Ruse rests his history on some shaky historical and philosophic assumptions, particularly the unexamined notion that evolutionary theory is an abstract entity that is unproblematically realized in different historical periods. He also assumes that Darwin conceived nature as if it were a Manchester spinning loom -- a clanking, dispassionate machine. A more subtle analysis, which Ruse eschews, might discover that Darwin's conception of nature owed a strong debt to German Romanticism and that he contrived to infuse nature with moral and aesthetic values, not to suck them from nature. Ruse proves he is a thinker to contend with, and this essay is quite contentious
Keywords adaptation  altruism  Charles Darwin  design  evolutionary theory  mechanism  natural selection  purpose  Romanticism  Michael Ruse  teleology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:HIST.0000020388.99933.5b
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Darwinism and Mechanism: Metaphor in Science.Michael Ruse - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2):285-302.
The Darwinian Tension.Hajo Greif - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 53:53-61.
Discussion.Michael Ruse - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (4):402-403.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
146 ( #75,327 of 2,461,927 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,927 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes