Political Minimalism and Social Debates: The Case of Human-Enhancement Technologies

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):347-357 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A faulty understanding of the relationship between morality and politics encumbers many contemporary debates on human enhancement. As a result, some ethical reflections on enhancement undervalue its social dimensions, while some social approaches to the topic lack normative import. In this essay, I use my own conception of the relationship between ethics and politics, which I call “political minimalism,” in order to support and strengthen the existing social perspectives on human-enhancement technologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thinking across species—a critical bioethics approach to enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Enhancement technologies and human identity.David Degrazia - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):261 – 283.
Human Enhancement.Eric Juengst & Daniel Moseley - 2016 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-21

Downloads
47 (#329,442)

6 months
13 (#277,191)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Javier Rodríguez
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

View all 38 references / Add more references