Crazy Like a Fox: Validity and Ethics of Animal Models of Human Psychiatric Disease

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (2):140-151 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal models of human disease play a central role in modern biomedical science. Developing animal models for human mental illness presents unique practical and philosophical challenges. In this article we argue that existing animal models of psychiatric disease are not valid, attempts to model syndromes are undermined by current nosology, models of symptoms are rife with circular logic and anthropomorphism, any model must make unjustified assumptions about subjective experience, and any model deemed valid would be inherently unethical, for if an animal adequately models human subjective experience, then there is no morally relevant difference between that animal and a human

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mutant mice: Experimental organisms as materialised models in biomedicine.Lara Huber & Lara K. Keuck - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):385-391.
Animal Models of Human Disease.Sara Green - 2024 - Cambridge University Press.
Animal Models in Neuropsychiatry: Do the benefits outweigh the moral costs?Carrie Figdor - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):530-535.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
36 (#119,765)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Rollin
Last affiliation: Colorado State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references