Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2 (3):235-240 (1989)
Knowledge of the backgrounds of students of behaviour working in the field of applied animal behavior science may help us to recognize their influence on conclusions reached in a particular study and on more general points of view. This recognition may result in a speed up of the progress in this science, to the benefit of science and animals. Some types are: (1) Eco-ethologists (ethologists of the hunters-type). They like to stalk healthy wild animals in their natural environment. They are less interested in the abnormal behavior of domestic animals under husbandry circumstances. (2) Behaviorists. These are psychologists that still think in a man-animal dichotomy. They are not interested in animals for their own sake but as models for human behavior. (3) Behavior physiologists. These biologists are not primarily interested in behavior. Because of the type of experiments they perform they have an aversity against animal protectionists. (4) Ethologists of the farmers type. These ethologists want to posses animals, collect animal species, take care of them and breed them. They are able to speak on approximately the same wavelength as farmers as well as animal protectionists. (5) Zootechnicians of the farmers type. These scientists want to make a living out of animals and like to take care for them. They are also able to speak at approximately the same wavelength as farmers and animal protectionists
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism.Karl R. Popper & John C. Eccles - 1977 - Springer.
The Question of Animal Awareness.Donald R. Griffin - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):399-403.
Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Van Rooijen Jeroen - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Jeroen Rooijevann - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Backgrounds of Students of Behavior in Relation to Their Attitude Toward Animal Well-Being.Jeroen van Rooijen - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (3).
Natural Behavior, Animal Rights, or Making Money – a Study of Swedish Organic Farmers' View of Animal Issues.Vonne Lund, Sven Hemlin & James White - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):157-179.
Animal Cognition and Animal Minds.Colin Allen - 1997 - In Martin Carrier & Peter K. Machamer (eds.), Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind. Pittsburgh University Press.
Exploratory Behavior and the Welfare of Intensively Kept Animals.D. G. M. Wood-Gush & K. Vestergaard - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (2):161-169.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Learning Ethics From Our Relationships with Animals.Maurice Hamington - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):177-188.
Assessing the Importance of Natural Behavior for Animal Welfare.M. B. M. Bracke & H. Hopster - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):77-89.
Can Natural Behavior Be Cultivated? The Farm as Local Human/Animal Culture.Pär Segerdahl - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):167-193.
Concept Attribution in Nonhuman Animals: Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Ascribing Complex Mental Processes.Colin Allen & Marc D. Hauser - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):221-240.
Animal Agriculture: Symbiosis, Culture, or Ethical Conflict? [REVIEW]Vonne Lund & I. Anna S. Olsson - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):47-56.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads4 ( #642,043 of 2,170,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,417 of 2,170,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?