The hardest test for a theory of cognition: The input test

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):618-619 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary defines an additional characteristic of human learning. The nature of this test is different from the ones by Newell: This is a hard, pass/fail type of test. Thus a theory of cognition cannot partially satisfy this test ; it either conforms to the requirement fully, or it doesn't. If a theory of cognition cannot satisfy this property of human learning, then the theory is not valid at all

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Newell's list.Joseph Agassi - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):601-602.
A multilevel approach to modeling human cognition.Hongbin Wang, Todd R. Johnson & Jiajie Zhang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):626-627.
Rethinking learning and development in the Newell test.Sylvain Sirois - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):619-620.
Poppering the Newell test.Niels A. Taatgen - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):621-622.
Parcellation: A hard theory to test.P. G. H. Clarke - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (3):335-335.
The Newell test for a theory of cognition.John R. Anderson & Christian Lebiere - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):587-601.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#372,384)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references