Descartes's case for dualism

Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1):29-63 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes's dualism, and his argument for it, are often understood in terms of the modal notion of separability. I argue that the central notions, substance and real distinction, should not be understood this way. Descartes's well-known argument for dualism relies implicitly on views he spells out in the Principles of Philosophy, where he explains that a substance has a nature that consists in a single attribute, and all its qualities are modes of that nature. The argument relies ultimately on a deeply rationalistic view of substance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartesian Substance Dualism.Richard Swinburne - 2018 - In Jonathan J. Loose, Angus John Louis Menuge & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 133–152.
O conceito cartesiano de atributo principal.Lia Levy - 2011 - In Ethel Rocha & Lia Levy (eds.), Estudos de Filosofia Moderna. Porto Alegre: Linus Editora. pp. 69-80.
Il concetto cartesiano di attributo principale.Lia Levy - 2018 - Giornale Critico di Storia Delle Idee 2:227-236.
Descartes's Conception of the Mind.Maria Helena Rozemond - 1989 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Against Cartesian Dualism.Jaegwon Kim - 2018 - In Jonathan J. Loose, Angus John Louis Menuge & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 152–167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
253 (#83,654)

6 months
16 (#172,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marleen Rozemond
University of Toronto, Mississauga

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references