What Difference Reveals About Similarity

Cognitive Science 36 (6):1019-1050 (2012)

Abstract
Detecting that two images are different is faster for highly dissimilar images than for highly similar images. Paradoxically, we showed that the reverse occurs when people are asked to describe how two images differ—that is, to state a difference between two images. Following structure-mapping theory, we propose that this disassociation arises from the multistage nature of the comparison process. Detecting that two images are different can be done in the initial (local-matching) stage, but only for pairs with low overlap; thus, “different” responses are faster for low-similarity than for high-similarity pairs. In contrast, identifying a specific difference generally requires a full structural alignment of the two images, and this alignment process is faster for high-similarity pairs. We described four experiments that demonstrate this dissociation and show that the results can be simulated using the Structure-Mapping Engine. These results pose a significant challenge for nonstructural accounts of similarity comparison and suggest that structural alignment processes play a significant role in visual comparison
Keywords Same‐different judgments  Structure‐mapping  Alignable differences  Perceptual comparison  Structural alignment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01250.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,330
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Features of Similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
Categories and Concepts.Edward E. Smith & L. Douglas - 1981 - Harvard University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Exhuming Similarity.Dedre Gentner - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.
In Search of Radical Similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
Objective Similarity and Mental Representation.Alistair M. C. Isaac - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):683-704.
Evolution.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (1):96-109.
The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-05-12

Total views
148 ( #56,333 of 2,291,031 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #13,813 of 2,291,031 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature