Religious Studies 33 (2):203-216 (1997)
This article is an analysis of the theological-philosophical revolution that Leibowitz's thought represents in the philosophy of religion in general and in Jewish philosophy in particular. This revolution relies on a positivist viewpoint, which denies any possibility of making statements about God. In his approach, statements about God are interpreted as statements denoting the relationship between the individual and God. Conventional religious beliefs -- such as the belief in the creation or in revelation -- become meaningless. Leibowitz therefore suggests a new interpretation, both of theoretical religious beliefs and of the normative system -- the Halakha. The belief in revelation is construed as a human judgment, which endows the halakhic system with divine validity. Halakha does not draw its meaning from its divine source but from its inner religious meaning, which Leibowitz sees in worship
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
What's God Got to Do with It? Atheism and Religious Practice.David Benatar - 2006 - Ratio 19 (4):383–400.
Similar books and articles
Holy Argument: Some Reflections on the Jewish Piety of Argument, Process Theology and the Philosophy of Religion.N. L. Tidwell - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (4):477-488.
On Yeshayahu Leibowitz's Use of Religious Terminology.Hannah Kasher - 2001 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 10 (1):27-55.
A Clearly Democratic Religious-Zionist Philosophy: The Early Thought of Yeshayahu Leibowitz.Moshe Hellinger - 2008 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 16 (2):253-282.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #82,176 of 2,158,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,472 )
How can I increase my downloads?