What price neurophilosophy?

Philosophy of Science Association 1:461-68 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A premise in the recent eliminativist arguments of Paul and Patricia Churchland is the power of connectionist-type models to solve problems facing cognitive science. I argue that their demonstrations of this power do not challenge folk psychology. Implicit in the Churchlands' arguments is the premise that folk psychology will fail to reduce to neuroscience. In the remainder of the paper I argue that just as the failure of classical genetics to reduce to molecular genetics does not suggest the elimination of classical genetics, so the possible future failure of folk psychology to reduce to neuroscience would not of itself argue for the elimination of folk psychology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Folk psychology and cognitive architecture.Frances Egan - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):179-96.
Neuroscience and folk psychology: An overview.David Hodgson - 1994 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 1 (2):205-216.
Folk psychology as a theory.Ian Martin Ravenscroft - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Instrumentalism in psychology.William Seager - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):191 – 203.
Can intuitive psychology survive the growth of neuroscience?Keith Campbell - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (June):143-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#308,769)

6 months
6 (#531,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Saidel
George Washington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references