Baconian experimentalism: Comments on McMullin's history of the philosophy of science

Philosophy of Science 68 (3):311-318 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Post-experimentalist pragmatism.Leonard J. Waks - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (1):17-28.
Robert Boyle's Baconian inheritance: A response to Laudan's Cartesian thesis.Rose-Mary Sargent - 1985 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (4):469-486.
Baconian bees in the electromagnetic fields: Experimenter-theorists in nineteenth-century electrodynamics.Olivier Darrigol - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (3):307-345.
History and Philosophy of Science: A Marriage of Convenience?Ernan McMullin - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:585 - 601.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
196 (#98,206)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method.Slobodan Perovic - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):162-173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
La théorie physique: son objet et sa structure.P. Duhem - 1906 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 61:324-327.
The Principles of Science, a Treatise on Logic and Scientific Method.W. Stanley Jevons - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (61):65-65.
In defence of Francis Bacon. A criticism of the critics of the Inductive Method.Mary Horton - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (3):241-278.

Add more references